TEAM COMPARISON2023 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 7
+0.093Net EPA / play+0.215
+0.064 (7)Offense EPA / play+0.066 (5)
-0.029 (17)Defense EPA / play-0.149 (2)
46.1% (6)Offense success %47.4% (3)
GAME NARRATIVE
DET B-tier pick misses. BAL takes it.
MISSED
Model picked DET but BAL won. Projected margin was 4.5, the model overestimated by 36.5 points.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 29.0 points.
HIGH WIND
16 MPH winds at game time. Expect suppressed passing efficiency and lower scoring.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.