Going in, our model had favored Denver Broncos at 61% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 2 Broncos, 2 Colts.
PICK: DEN
TIER C
PICK LOSTATS ✗
DEN 61%
IND 39%
Model confidence: DEN 61%
Our line: DEN -3.7
ODDS
SPREAD
DEN -2.5
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
DEN -3.7
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
DEN · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
61%
DEN · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
54%
DIFFERENCE
+7%
SOURCE
DEN
IND
DEN WIN %
Closing line
-130
+110
54.5%
WIN % is each book’s odds as a win chance, with the book’s cut taken out. The card above is their average.
TEAM COMPARISON2025 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 2
+0.138Net EPA / play+0.068
+0.050 (10)Offense EPA / play+0.072 (9)
-0.088 (6)Defense EPA / play+0.004 (16)
44.2% (16)Offense success %46.3% (8)
GAME NARRATIVE
DEN C-tier pick misses. IND takes it.
MISSED
Model picked DEN but IND won. Projected margin was 3.7, the model overestimated by 4.7 points.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 4 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 3.5 points.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.