Going in, our model had favored Minnesota Vikings at 68% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 5 Falcons, 3 Vikings.
PICK: MIN
TIER B
PICK LOSTATS ✗
ATL 32%
MIN 68%
Model confidence: MIN 68%
Our line: MIN -6.4
ODDS
SPREAD
MIN -3.5
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
MIN -6.4
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
MIN · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
68%
MIN · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
62%
DIFFERENCE
+6%
SOURCE
ATL
MIN
MIN WIN %
Closing line
+150
-180
62.1%
WIN % is each book’s odds as a win chance, with the book’s cut taken out. The card above is their average.
TEAM COMPARISON2025 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 2
-0.018Net EPA / play-0.016
-0.021 (24)Offense EPA / play-0.116 (28)
-0.004 (15)Defense EPA / play-0.100 (4)
43.7% (18)Offense success %42.6% (23)
GAME NARRATIVE
MIN B-tier pick misses. ATL takes it.
MISSED
Model picked MIN but ATL won. Projected margin was 6.4, the model overestimated by 22.4 points.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 5 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 19.5 points.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.