Final: New England Patriots 33, Miami Dolphins 27.
Going in, our model had favored Miami Dolphins at 67% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 2 Patriots, 6 Dolphins.
PICK: MIA
TIER B
PICK LOSTATS ✗
NE 33%
MIA 67%
Model confidence: MIA 67%
Our line: MIA -6.1
ODDS
SPREAD
MIA -1.5
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
MIA -6.1
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
MIA · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
67%
MIA · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
53%
DIFFERENCE
+14%
SOURCE
NE
MIA
MIA WIN %
Closing line
+105
-125
53.4%
TEAM COMPARISON2025 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 2
+0.205Net EPA / play-0.105
+0.158 (1)Offense EPA / play-0.017 (22)
-0.047 (11)Defense EPA / play+0.088 (26)
48.4% (3)Offense success %41.9% (27)
GAME NARRATIVE
MIA B-tier pick misses. NE takes it.
MISSED
Model picked MIA but NE won. Projected margin was 6.1, the model overestimated by 12.1 points.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 5 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 7.5 points.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.