Going in, our model had favored Tennessee Titans at 51% win probability, and the pick won.
Out or doubtful: 5 Titans, 2 Broncos.
PICK: TEN
TIER C
PICK WONATS ✗
TEN 51%
DEN 50%
Model confidence: TEN 51%
Our line: TEN -0.2
ODDS
SPREAD
TEN -3.0
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
TEN -0.2
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
TEN · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
51%
TEN · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
62%
DIFFERENCE
-11%
SOURCE
TEN
DEN
TEN WIN %
Closing line
-175
+157
62.4%
WIN % is each book’s odds as a win chance, with the book’s cut taken out. The card above is their average.
TEAM COMPARISON2020 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 1
+0.053Net EPA / play-0.147
+0.171 (3)Offense EPA / play-0.104 (31)
+0.117 (28)Defense EPA / play+0.043 (18)
50.1% (3)Offense success %38.8% (32)
GAME NARRATIVE
TEN C-tier pick hits. Model was directionally correct.
NAILED IT
Model projected TEN by 0.2. Actual: 2 points. The model was within 1.8 points of the real margin.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 9 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
BAD BEAT
Missed the spread by just 1.0 point, a bad-beat loss.
Another data point for the model. C-tier picks continue to track.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.