Final: Philadelphia Eagles 17, Washington Commanders 27.
Going in, our model had favored Philadelphia Eagles at 61% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 4 Eagles, 2 Commanders.
PICK: PHI
TIER A+
PICK LOSTATS ✗
PHI 61%
WAS 39%
Model confidence: PHI 61%
Our line: PHI -3.9
ODDS
SPREAD
PHI -5.5
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
PHI -3.9
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
PHI · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
61%
PHI · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
68%
DIFFERENCE
-7%
SOURCE
PHI
WAS
PHI WIN %
Closing line
-227
+200
68.0%
WIN % is each book’s odds as a win chance, with the book’s cut taken out. The card above is their average.
TEAM COMPARISON2020 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 1
-0.107Net EPA / play+0.023
-0.089 (30)Offense EPA / play-0.067 (29)
+0.018 (13)Defense EPA / play-0.091 (3)
40.6% (30)Offense success %41.2% (29)
GAME NARRATIVE
PHI A+-tier pick misses. WAS takes it.
MISSED
Model picked PHI but WAS won. Projected margin was 3.9, the model overestimated by 13.9 points.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 2 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 15.5 points.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.