Final: Arizona Cardinals 24, San Francisco 49ers 20.
Going in, our model had favored San Francisco 49ers at 64% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 1 Cardinals, 2 49ers.
PICK: SF
TIER A+
PICK LOSTATS ✗
ARI 36%
SF 64%
Model confidence: SF 64%
Our line: SF -4.7
ODDS
SPREAD
SF -7.0
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
SF -4.7
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
SF · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
64%
SF · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
72%
DIFFERENCE
-8%
SOURCE
ARI
SF
SF WIN %
Closing line
+242
-280
72.2%
WIN % is each book’s odds as a win chance, with the book’s cut taken out. The card above is their average.
TEAM COMPARISON2020 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 1
+0.031Net EPA / play+0.042
+0.038 (14)Offense EPA / play+0.008 (18)
+0.007 (11)Defense EPA / play-0.034 (8)
45.4% (18)Offense success %46.0% (14)
GAME NARRATIVE
SF A+-tier pick misses. ARI takes it.
MISSED
Model picked SF but ARI won. Projected margin was 4.7, the model overestimated by 8.7 points.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 7 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 11.0 points.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.