Going in, our model had favored Baltimore Ravens at 70% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 2 Raiders, 2 Ravens.
PICK: BAL
TIER A
PICK LOSTATS ✗
LV 30%
BAL 70%
Model confidence: BAL 70%
Our line: BAL -7.0
ODDS
SPREAD
BAL -9.0
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
BAL -7.0
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
BAL · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
70%
BAL · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
80%
DIFFERENCE
-10%
SOURCE
LV
BAL
BAL WIN %
Closing line
+350
-455
79.9%
WIN % is each book’s odds as a win chance, with the book’s cut taken out. The card above is their average.
TEAM COMPARISON2024 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 2
-0.164Net EPA / play+0.269
-0.143 (31)Offense EPA / play+0.218 (1)
+0.021 (19)Defense EPA / play-0.051 (8)
40.5% (26)Offense success %50.0% (2)
GAME NARRATIVE
BAL A-tier pick misses. LV takes it.
MISSED
Model picked BAL but LV won. Projected margin was 7.0, the model overestimated by 10.0 points.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 12.0 points.
DRAMATIC
The win probability swung past 50% 1 time. A competitive game throughout.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.