Going in, our model had favored Dallas Cowboys at 63% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 2 Saints, 2 Cowboys.
PICK: DAL
TIER B
PICK LOSTATS ✗
NO 37%
DAL 63%
Model confidence: DAL 63%
Our line: DAL -4.5
ODDS
SPREAD
DAL -6.5
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
DAL -4.5
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
DAL · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
63%
DAL · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
72%
DIFFERENCE
-9%
SOURCE
NO
DAL
DAL WIN %
Closing line
+235
-290
72.3%
TEAM COMPARISON2024 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 2
-0.101Net EPA / play-0.192
-0.057 (25)Offense EPA / play-0.109 (29)
+0.044 (24)Defense EPA / play+0.083 (30)
40.6% (23)Offense success %40.6% (23)
GAME NARRATIVE
DAL B-tier pick misses. NO takes it.
MISSED
Model picked DAL but NO won. Projected margin was 4.5, the model overestimated by 29.5 points.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 31.5 points.
DRAMATIC
The win probability swung past 50% 1 time. A competitive game throughout.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.