Final: Dallas Cowboys 20, Los Angeles Chargers 17.
Going in, our model had favored Los Angeles Chargers at 56% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 1 Cowboys, 2 Chargers.
PICK: LAC
TIER B
PICK LOSTATS ✗
DAL 44%
LAC 56%
Model confidence: LAC 56%
Our line: LAC -2.1
ODDS
SPREAD
LAC -3.0
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
LAC -2.1
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
LAC · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
56%
LAC · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
59%
DIFFERENCE
-3%
SOURCE
DAL
LAC
LAC WIN %
Closing line
+135
-150
58.7%
WIN % is each book’s odds as a win chance, with the book’s cut taken out. The card above is their average.
TEAM COMPARISON2021 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 2
+0.187Net EPA / play+0.061
+0.096 (5)Offense EPA / play+0.095 (6)
-0.091 (3)Defense EPA / play+0.033 (24)
47.0% (7)Offense success %47.6% (6)
GAME NARRATIVE
LAC B-tier pick misses. DAL takes it.
MISSED
Model picked LAC but DAL won. Projected margin was 2.1, the model overestimated by 5.1 points.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 13 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 6.0 points.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.