Going in, our model had favored New York Giants at 52% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 1 Giants.
PICK: NYG
TIER C
PICK LOSTATS ✗
DEN 48%
NYG 52%
Model confidence: NYG 52%
Our line: NYG -0.7
ODDS
SPREAD
NYG +3.0
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
NYG -0.7
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
NYG · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
52%
NYG · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
43%
DIFFERENCE
+9%
SOURCE
DEN
NYG
NYG WIN %
Closing line
-139
+125
43.1%
WIN % is each book’s odds as a win chance, with the book’s cut taken out. The card above is their average.
TEAM COMPARISON2021 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 1
+0.004Net EPA / play-0.192
+0.015 (17)Offense EPA / play-0.161 (32)
+0.011 (18)Defense EPA / play+0.031 (23)
44.7% (14)Offense success %39.3% (30)
GAME NARRATIVE
NYG C-tier pick misses. DEN takes it.
MISSED
Model picked NYG but DEN won. Projected margin was 0.7, the model overestimated by 14.7 points.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 7 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 11.0 points.
HIGH WIND
19 MPH winds at game time. Expect suppressed passing efficiency and lower scoring.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.