Going in, our model had favored Atlanta Falcons at 54% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 2 Eagles.
PICK: ATL
TIER C
PICK LOSTATS ✗
PHI 46%
ATL 54%
Model confidence: ATL 54%
Our line: ATL -1.5
ODDS
SPREAD
ATL -3.5
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
ATL -1.5
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
ATL · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
54%
ATL · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
63%
DIFFERENCE
-9%
SOURCE
PHI
ATL
ATL WIN %
Closing line
+161
-180
63.0%
TEAM COMPARISON2021 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 1
+0.059Net EPA / play-0.180
+0.070 (10)Offense EPA / play-0.098 (28)
+0.011 (17)Defense EPA / play+0.082 (29)
46.9% (8)Offense success %40.4% (29)
GAME NARRATIVE
ATL C-tier pick misses. PHI takes it.
MISSED
Model picked ATL but PHI won. Projected margin was 1.5, the model overestimated by 27.5 points.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 5 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 29.5 points.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.