Final: Los Angeles Chargers 20, Washington Commanders 16.
Going in, our model had favored Washington Commanders at 49% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 1 Chargers.
PICK: WAS
TIER C
PICK LOSTATS ✗
LAC 51%
WAS 49%
Model confidence: WAS 49%
Our line: WAS +0.2
ODDS
SPREAD
WAS -2.5
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
WAS +0.2
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
WAS · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
49%
WAS · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
55%
DIFFERENCE
-6%
SOURCE
LAC
WAS
WAS WIN %
Closing line
+117
-129
55.1%
WIN % is each book’s odds as a win chance, with the book’s cut taken out. The card above is their average.
TEAM COMPARISON2021 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 1
+0.061Net EPA / play-0.124
+0.095 (6)Offense EPA / play-0.057 (21)
+0.033 (24)Defense EPA / play+0.067 (26)
47.6% (6)Offense success %43.9% (20)
GAME NARRATIVE
WAS C-tier pick misses. LAC takes it.
MISSED
Model picked WAS but LAC won. Projected margin was 0.2, the model overestimated by 3.8 points.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 7 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 6.5 points.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.