Going in, our model had favored Buffalo Bills at 63% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 1 Bills.
PICK: BUF
TIER B
PICK LOSTATS ✗
PIT 37%
BUF 63%
Model confidence: BUF 63%
Our line: BUF -4.3
ODDS
SPREAD
BUF -6.5
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
BUF -4.3
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
BUF · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
63%
BUF · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
71%
DIFFERENCE
-8%
SOURCE
PIT
BUF
BUF WIN %
Closing line
+232
-267
71.3%
WIN % is each book’s odds as a win chance, with the book’s cut taken out. The card above is their average.
TEAM COMPARISON2021 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 1
-0.090Net EPA / play+0.242
-0.074 (25)Offense EPA / play+0.101 (4)
+0.016 (19)Defense EPA / play-0.141 (1)
39.1% (31)Offense success %47.7% (5)
GAME NARRATIVE
BUF B-tier pick misses. PIT takes it.
MISSED
Model picked BUF but PIT won. Projected margin was 4.3, the model overestimated by 11.3 points.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 13.5 points.
DRAMATIC
The win probability swung past 50% 1 time. A competitive game throughout.
HIGH WIND
17 MPH winds at game time. Expect suppressed passing efficiency and lower scoring.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.