Going in, our model had favored Cleveland Browns at 52% win probability, and the pick won.
Out or doubtful: 4 Bengals, 4 Browns.
PICK: CLE
TIER B
PICK WONATS ✗
CIN 48%
CLE 52%
Model confidence: CLE 52%
Our line: CLE -0.6
ODDS
SPREAD
CLE -6.0
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
CLE -0.6
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
CLE · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
52%
CLE · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
69%
DIFFERENCE
-17%
SOURCE
CIN
CLE
CLE WIN %
Closing line
+213
-243
69.4%
WIN % is each book’s odds as a win chance, with the book’s cut taken out. The card above is their average.
TEAM COMPARISON2020 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 2
-0.141Net EPA / play+0.011
-0.049 (26)Offense EPA / play+0.088 (10)
+0.092 (26)Defense EPA / play+0.077 (23)
43.6% (23)Offense success %46.6% (9)
GAME NARRATIVE
CLE B-tier pick hits. Model was directionally correct.
CORRECT
Model correctly picked CLE. Projected margin: 0.6. Actual: 5. Off by 4.4 points but directionally right.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 4 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
BAD BEAT
Missed the spread by just 1.0 point, a bad-beat loss.
Another data point for the model. B-tier picks continue to track.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.