Going in, our model had favored Buffalo Bills at 59% win probability, and the pick won.
Out or doubtful: 3 Bills, 2 Dolphins.
PICK: BUF
TIER B
PICK WONATS ✗
BUF 59%
MIA 41%
Model confidence: BUF 59%
Our line: BUF -3.1
ODDS
SPREAD
BUF -5.5
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
BUF -3.1
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
BUF · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
59%
BUF · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
70%
DIFFERENCE
-11%
SOURCE
BUF
MIA
BUF WIN %
Closing line
-244
+214
69.5%
TEAM COMPARISON2020 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 2
+0.147Net EPA / play+0.048
+0.164 (4)Offense EPA / play+0.007 (19)
+0.017 (12)Defense EPA / play-0.041 (7)
50.2% (2)Offense success %46.0% (13)
GAME NARRATIVE
BUF B-tier pick hits. Model was directionally correct.
NAILED IT
Model projected BUF by 3.1. Actual: 3 points. The model was within 0.1 points of the real margin.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 9 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 2.5 points.
Another data point for the model. B-tier picks continue to track.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
BUF
No noteworthy trends
MIA
Home Underdog 4-1 ATS (80%)Divisional 4-2 ATS (67%)
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.