Final: New England Patriots 30, Seattle Seahawks 35.
Going in, our model had favored New England Patriots at 55% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 1 Patriots, 2 Seahawks.
PICK: NE
TIER B
PICK LOSTATS ✗
NE 55%
SEA 45%
Model confidence: NE 55%
Our line: NE -1.6
ODDS
SPREAD
NE +4.0
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
NE -1.6
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
NE · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
55%
NE · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
35%
DIFFERENCE
+20%
SOURCE
NE
SEA
NE WIN %
Closing line
+177
-199
34.8%
WIN % is each book’s odds as a win chance, with the book’s cut taken out. The card above is their average.
TEAM COMPARISON2020 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 2
-0.076Net EPA / play+0.047
-0.004 (21)Offense EPA / play+0.087 (11)
+0.071 (22)Defense EPA / play+0.040 (17)
46.1% (12)Offense success %48.2% (6)
GAME NARRATIVE
NE B-tier pick misses. SEA takes it.
MISSED
Model picked NE but SEA won. Projected margin was 1.6, the model overestimated by 6.6 points.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 8 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
BAD BEAT
Missed the spread by just 1.0 point, a bad-beat loss.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.