Going in, our model had favored Pittsburgh Steelers at 52% win probability, and the pick won.
Out or doubtful: 2 Broncos, 2 Steelers.
PICK: PIT
TIER C
PICK WONATS ✗
DEN 48%
PIT 52%
Model confidence: PIT 52%
Our line: PIT -0.8
ODDS
SPREAD
PIT -6.0
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
PIT -0.8
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
PIT · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
52%
PIT · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
71%
DIFFERENCE
-19%
SOURCE
DEN
PIT
PIT WIN %
Closing line
+232
-267
71.3%
TEAM COMPARISON2020 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 2
-0.147Net EPA / play+0.128
-0.104 (31)Offense EPA / play+0.010 (17)
+0.043 (18)Defense EPA / play-0.118 (2)
38.8% (32)Offense success %43.2% (25)
GAME NARRATIVE
PIT C-tier pick hits. Model was directionally correct.
CORRECT
Model correctly picked PIT. Projected margin: 0.8. Actual: 5. Off by 4.2 points but directionally right.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 2 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
BAD BEAT
Missed the spread by just 1.0 point, a bad-beat loss.
Another data point for the model. C-tier picks continue to track.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.