Going in, our model had favored Cincinnati Bengals at 76% win probability, and the pick won.
Out or doubtful: 1 Browns.
PICK: CIN
TIER A+
PICK WONATS ✗
CIN 76%
CLE 24%
Model confidence: CIN 76%
Our line: CIN -9.6
ODDS
SPREAD
CIN -5.5
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
CIN -9.6
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
CIN · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
76%
CIN · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
68%
DIFFERENCE
+8%
SOURCE
CIN
CLE
CIN WIN %
Closing line
-238
TEAM COMPARISON2025 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 1
-0.138Net EPA / play-0.094
-0.009 (19)Offense EPA / play-0.190 (31)
+0.130 (29)Defense EPA / play-0.096 (5)
45.5% (11)Offense success %34.5% (32)
GAME NARRATIVE
CIN A+-tier pick hits. Model was directionally correct.
CORRECT
Model correctly picked CIN. Projected margin: 9.6. Actual: 1. Off by 8.6 points but directionally right.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 15 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 4.5 points.
Another data point for the model. A+-tier picks continue to track.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
CIN
Home Underdog 2-3 ATS (40%)Divisional 2-4 ATS (33%)
CLE
Home Underdog 5-2 ATS (71%)Divisional 4-2 ATS (67%)
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.