Going in, our model had favored Minnesota Vikings at 74% win probability, and the pick won.
Out or doubtful: 3 Vikings, 1 Bears.
PICK: MIN
TIER A
PICK WONATS ✓
MIN 74%
CHI 26%
Model confidence: MIN 74%
Our line: MIN -8.7
ODDS
SPREAD
MIN -1.5
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
MIN -8.7
OUR LINE
COVERED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
MIN · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
74%
MIN · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
50%
DIFFERENCE
+24%
SOURCE
MIN
CHI
MIN WIN %
Closing line
-112
-108
50.5%
TEAM COMPARISON2025 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 1
-0.016Net EPA / play+0.061
-0.116 (28)Offense EPA / play+0.080 (8)
-0.100 (4)Defense EPA / play+0.018 (19)
42.6% (23)Offense success %45.8% (9)
GAME NARRATIVE
MIN A-tier pick hits. Model was directionally correct.
CORRECT
Model correctly picked MIN. Projected margin: 8.7. Actual: 3. Off by 5.7 points but directionally right.
COVERED
This pick covered the spread by 1.5 points.
DRAMATIC
The win probability swung past 50% 1 time. A competitive game throughout.
Another data point for the model. A-tier picks continue to track.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.