Final: New York Giants 6, Washington Commanders 21.
Going in, our model had favored Washington Commanders at 72% win probability, and the pick won.
Out or doubtful: 1 Giants.
PICK: WAS
TIER A+
PICK WONATS ✓
NYG 28%
WAS 72%
Model confidence: WAS 72%
Our line: WAS -8.0
ODDS
SPREAD
WAS -6.0
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
WAS -8.0
OUR LINE
COVERED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
WAS · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
72%
WAS · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
73%
DIFFERENCE
-1%
SOURCE
NYG
WAS
WAS WIN %
Closing line
+240
-298
72.7%
TEAM COMPARISON2025 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 1
-0.075Net EPA / play-0.137
+0.012 (17)Offense EPA / play+0.005 (18)
+0.087 (25)Defense EPA / play+0.142 (30)
42.1% (25)Offense success %45.6% (10)
GAME NARRATIVE
WAS A+-tier pick hits. Model was directionally correct.
CORRECT
Model correctly picked WAS. Projected margin: 8.0. Actual: 15. Off by 7.0 points but directionally right.
COVERED
This pick covered the spread by 9.0 points.
Another data point for the model. A+-tier picks continue to track.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.