Going in, our model had favored Detroit Lions at 64% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 3 Lions.
PICK: DET
TIER B
PICK LOSTATS ✗
DET 64%
GB 36%
Model confidence: DET 64%
Our line: DET -4.9
ODDS
SPREAD
DET +1.5
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
DET -4.9
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
DET · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
64%
DET · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
48%
DIFFERENCE
+16%
SOURCE
DET
GB
DET WIN %
Closing line
+100
-120
47.7%
WIN % is each book’s odds as a win chance, with the book’s cut taken out. The card above is their average.
TEAM COMPARISON2025 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 1
+0.091Net EPA / play+0.082
+0.081 (7)Offense EPA / play+0.115 (4)
-0.010 (14)Defense EPA / play+0.033 (22)
45.2% (12)Offense success %47.7% (5)
GAME NARRATIVE
DET B-tier pick misses. GB takes it.
MISSED
Model picked DET but GB won. Projected margin was 4.9, the model overestimated by 18.9 points.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 12.5 points.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.