Going in, our model had favored Tennessee Titans at 75% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 2 Giants, 4 Titans.
PICK: TEN
TIER S
PICK LOST (STRAIGHT UP)ATS: LOST
TEN 75%
NYG 25%
Model confidence: TEN 75%
Our line: TEN -9.1
ODDS
SPREAD
TEN -5.5
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
TEN -9.1
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
TEN · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
75%
TEN · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
69%
DIFFERENCE
+6%
SOURCE
NYG
TEN
TEN WIN %
Closing line
+209
TEAM COMPARISON2022 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 1
-0.016Net EPA / play-0.064
+0.030 (9)Offense EPA / play-0.059 (25)
+0.046 (28)Defense EPA / play+0.004 (18)
44.9% (14)Offense success %41.1% (22)
GAME NARRATIVE
TEN S-tier pick misses. NYG takes it.
MISSED
Model picked TEN but NYG won. Projected margin was 9.1, the model overestimated by 10.1 points.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 6.5 points.
DRAMATIC
The win probability swung past 50% 1 time. A competitive game throughout.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.