Final: Washington Commanders 27, Detroit Lions 36.
Going in, our model had favored Washington Commanders at 64% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 1 Lions.
PICK: WAS
TIER B
PICK LOSTATS ✗
WAS 64%
DET 36%
Model confidence: WAS 64%
Our line: WAS -4.8
ODDS
SPREAD
WAS -1.0
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
WAS -4.8
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
WAS · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
64%
WAS · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
52%
DIFFERENCE
+12%
SOURCE
WAS
DET
WAS WIN %
Closing line
-114
+103
52.0%
TEAM COMPARISON2022 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 2
-0.003Net EPA / play-0.006
-0.078 (26)Offense EPA / play+0.072 (6)
-0.075 (4)Defense EPA / play+0.078 (30)
40.4% (28)Offense success %45.6% (9)
GAME NARRATIVE
WAS B-tier pick misses. DET takes it.
MISSED
Model picked WAS but DET won. Projected margin was 4.8, the model overestimated by 13.8 points.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 2 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 10.0 points.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.