Final: New England Patriots 17, Pittsburgh Steelers 14.
Going in, our model had favored Pittsburgh Steelers at 56% win probability, and the pick lost.
PICK: PIT
TIER C
PICK LOSTATS PUSH
NE 44%
PIT 56%
Model confidence: PIT 56%
Our line: PIT -2.2
ODDS
SPREAD
PIT +3.0
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
PIT -2.2
OUR LINE
PUSH
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
PIT · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
56%
PIT · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
41%
DIFFERENCE
+15%
SOURCE
NE
PIT
PIT WIN %
Closing line
-150
+135
41.3%
WIN % is each book’s odds as a win chance, with the book’s cut taken out. The card above is their average.
TEAM COMPARISON2022 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 2
+0.035Net EPA / play-0.012
-0.054 (24)Offense EPA / play+0.012 (12)
-0.089 (3)Defense EPA / play+0.024 (26)
40.9% (24)Offense success %45.1% (12)
GAME NARRATIVE
PIT C-tier pick misses. NE takes it.
MISSED
Model picked PIT but NE won. Projected margin was 2.2, the model overestimated by 5.2 points.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 7 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
PUSH
Final margin landed exactly on the spread (+3.0). Push, no winner ATS.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.