Final: Arizona Cardinals 16, Washington Commanders 20.
Going in, our model had favored Washington Commanders at 68% win probability, and the pick won.
Out or doubtful: 1 Cardinals.
PICK: WAS
TIER B
PICK WONATS ✗
ARI 32%
WAS 68%
Model confidence: WAS 68%
Our line: WAS -6.5
ODDS
SPREAD
WAS -7.0
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
WAS -6.5
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
WAS · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
68%
WAS · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
75%
DIFFERENCE
-7%
SOURCE
ARI
WAS
WAS WIN %
Closing line
+270
-340
75.1%
WIN % is each book’s odds as a win chance, with the book’s cut taken out. The card above is their average.
TEAM COMPARISON2023 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 1
-0.157Net EPA / play-0.190
-0.071 (22)Offense EPA / play-0.106 (27)
+0.085 (32)Defense EPA / play+0.085 (31)
40.5% (25)Offense success %41.0% (21)
GAME NARRATIVE
WAS B-tier pick hits. Model was directionally correct.
NAILED IT
Model projected WAS by 6.5. Actual: 4 points. The model was within 2.5 points of the real margin.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 8 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 3.0 points.
Another data point for the model. B-tier picks continue to track.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
ARI
Home Underdog 5-3 ATS (63%)Divisional 1-5 ATS (17%)
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.