Going in, our model had favored Seattle Seahawks at 69% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 2 Seahawks.
PICK: SEA
TIER B
PICK LOSTATS ✗
LA 31%
SEA 69%
Model confidence: SEA 69%
Our line: SEA -6.8
ODDS
SPREAD
SEA -4.5
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
SEA -6.8
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
SEA · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
69%
SEA · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
66%
DIFFERENCE
+3%
SOURCE
LA
SEA
SEA WIN %
Closing line
+180
-218
66.4%
TEAM COMPARISON2023 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 1
+0.048Net EPA / play-0.035
+0.039 (9)Offense EPA / play+0.016 (11)
-0.009 (22)Defense EPA / play+0.051 (30)
44.7% (8)Offense success %43.9% (11)
GAME NARRATIVE
SEA B-tier pick misses. LA takes it.
MISSED
Model picked SEA but LA won. Projected margin was 6.8, the model overestimated by 23.8 points.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 3 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 21.5 points.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.