Going in, our model had favored Buffalo Bills at 75% win probability, and the pick won.
Out or doubtful: 1 Cardinals, 1 Bills.
PICK: BUF
TIER A+
PICK WONATS ✗
BUF 75%
ARI 25%
Model confidence: BUF 75%
Our line: BUF -9.0
ODDS
SPREAD
BUF -6.5
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
BUF -9.0
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
BUF · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
75%
BUF · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
74%
DIFFERENCE
+1%
SOURCE
ARI
BUF
BUF WIN %
Closing line
+250
TEAM COMPARISON2024 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 1
+0.011Net EPA / play+0.197
+0.067 (11)Offense EPA / play+0.189 (2)
+0.056 (26)Defense EPA / play-0.009 (12)
47.3% (8)Offense success %47.5% (7)
GAME NARRATIVE
BUF A+-tier pick hits. Model was directionally correct.
NAILED IT
Model projected BUF by 9.0. Actual: 6 points. The model was within 3.0 points of the real margin.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 4 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
BAD BEAT
Missed the spread by just 0.5 points, a bad-beat loss.
HIGH WIND
20 MPH winds at game time. Expect suppressed passing efficiency and lower scoring.
Another data point for the model. A+-tier picks continue to track.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.