Going in, our model had favored Seattle Seahawks at 61% win probability, and the pick won.
Out or doubtful: 2 Seahawks.
PICK: SEA
TIER C
PICK WONATS ✗
DEN 39%
SEA 61%
Model confidence: SEA 61%
Our line: SEA -3.7
ODDS
SPREAD
SEA -6.5
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
SEA -3.7
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
SEA · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
61%
SEA · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
71%
DIFFERENCE
-10%
SOURCE
DEN
SEA
SEA WIN %
Closing line
+225
-278
71.4%
WIN % is each book’s odds as a win chance, with the book’s cut taken out. The card above is their average.
TEAM COMPARISON2024 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 1
+0.138Net EPA / play-0.018
+0.020 (14)Offense EPA / play-0.030 (19)
-0.118 (1)Defense EPA / play-0.012 (11)
42.7% (17)Offense success %43.9% (16)
GAME NARRATIVE
SEA C-tier pick hits. Model was directionally correct.
NAILED IT
Model projected SEA by 3.7. Actual: 6 points. The model was within 2.3 points of the real margin.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 6 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
BAD BEAT
Missed the spread by just 0.5 points, a bad-beat loss.
Another data point for the model. C-tier picks continue to track.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.