Going in, our model had favored New York Giants at 50% win probability, and the pick lost.
PICK: NYG
TIER C
PICK LOSTATS ✗
MIN 50%
NYG 50%
Model confidence: NYG 50%
Our line: NYG +0.0
ODDS
SPREAD
NYG +1.0
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
NYG +0.0
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
NYG · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
50%
NYG · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
49%
DIFFERENCE
+1%
SOURCE
MIN
NYG
NYG WIN %
Closing line
-115
-105
48.9%
TEAM COMPARISON2024 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 1
+0.103Net EPA / play-0.170
+0.016 (15)Offense EPA / play-0.107 (28)
-0.086 (3)Defense EPA / play+0.063 (28)
45.6% (12)Offense success %40.5% (25)
GAME NARRATIVE
NYG C-tier pick misses. MIN takes it.
MISSED
Model picked NYG but MIN won. Projected margin was 0.0, the model overestimated by 22.0 points.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 3 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 21.0 points.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.