Final: Green Bay Packers 29, Philadelphia Eagles 34.
Going in, our model had favored Green Bay Packers at 63% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 1 Packers, 2 Eagles.
PICK: GB
TIER B
PICK LOSTATS ✗
GB 63%
PHI 37%
Model confidence: GB 63%
Our line: GB -4.3
ODDS
SPREAD
GB +2.0
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
GB -4.3
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
GB · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
63%
GB · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
46%
DIFFERENCE
+17%
SOURCE
GB
PHI
GB WIN %
Closing line
+110
-130
45.5%
WIN % is each book’s odds as a win chance, with the book’s cut taken out. The card above is their average.
TEAM COMPARISON2024 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 1
+0.146Net EPA / play+0.212
+0.079 (8)Offense EPA / play+0.114 (6)
-0.067 (4)Defense EPA / play-0.098 (2)
44.9% (14)Offense success %45.3% (13)
GAME NARRATIVE
GB B-tier pick misses. PHI takes it.
MISSED
Model picked GB but PHI won. Projected margin was 4.3, the model overestimated by 9.3 points.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 16 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 3.0 points.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.