TEAM COMPARISON2025 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 4
+0.105Net EPA / play-0.022
+0.026 (15)Offense EPA / play-0.009 (20)
-0.079 (8)Defense EPA / play+0.013 (17)
43.1% (20)Offense success %42.4% (24)
GAME NARRATIVE
TB C-tier pick misses. PHI takes it.
MISSED
Model picked TB but PHI won. Projected margin was 0.0, the model overestimated by 6.0 points.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 2.5 points.
DRAMATIC
The win probability swung past 50% 1 time. A competitive game throughout.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.