TEAM COMPARISON2025 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 4
-0.137Net EPA / play-0.018
+0.005 (18)Offense EPA / play-0.021 (24)
+0.142 (30)Defense EPA / play-0.004 (15)
45.6% (10)Offense success %43.7% (18)
GAME NARRATIVE
WAS B-tier pick misses. ATL takes it.
MISSED
Model picked WAS but ATL won. Projected margin was 3.6, the model overestimated by 10.6 points.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 4.5 points.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.