Final: Los Angeles Chargers 24, Tennessee Titans 27.
Going in, our model had favored Los Angeles Chargers at 71% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 4 Chargers, 2 Titans.
PICK: LAC
TIER B
PICK LOSTATS ✗
LAC 71%
TEN 29%
Model confidence: LAC 71%
Our line: LAC -7.5
ODDS
SPREAD
LAC -2.5
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
LAC -7.5
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
LAC · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
71%
LAC · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
57%
DIFFERENCE
+14%
SOURCE
LAC
TEN
LAC WIN %
Closing line
-142
+120
56.6%
TEAM COMPARISON2023 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 2
-0.088Net EPA / play-0.055
-0.076 (24)Offense EPA / play-0.047 (18)
+0.012 (25)Defense EPA / play+0.007 (23)
41.0% (22)Offense success %39.7% (26)
GAME NARRATIVE
LAC B-tier pick misses. TEN takes it.
MISSED
Model picked LAC but TEN won. Projected margin was 7.5, the model overestimated by 10.5 points.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 9 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 5.5 points.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
LAC
Divisional 0-5 ATS (0%)
TEN
Home Underdog 4-2 ATS (67%)Divisional 1-5 ATS (17%)
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.