Going in, our model had favored Detroit Lions at 70% win probability, and the pick lost.
Out or doubtful: 3 Seahawks, 4 Lions.
PICK: DET
TIER B
PICK LOSTATS ✗
SEA 30%
DET 70%
Model confidence: DET 70%
Our line: DET -7.1
ODDS
SPREAD
DET -4.5
MARKET SPREAD · MARKET AVG
DET -7.1
OUR LINE
MISSED
VS SPREAD
MONEYLINE
DET · OUR WIN PROBABILITY
70%
DET · MARKET WIN PROBABILITY
66%
DIFFERENCE
+4%
SOURCE
SEA
DET
DET WIN %
Closing line
+180
-218
66.4%
WIN % is each book’s odds as a win chance, with the book’s cut taken out. The card above is their average.
TEAM COMPARISON2023 SEASON · EFFICIENCY, SCORING, TENDENCIES · RANK IN PARENTHESES · FULL-SEASON NUMBERS, NOT AS OF WEEK 2
-0.035Net EPA / play+0.093
+0.016 (11)Offense EPA / play+0.064 (7)
+0.051 (30)Defense EPA / play-0.029 (17)
43.9% (11)Offense success %46.1% (6)
GAME NARRATIVE
DET B-tier pick misses. SEA takes it.
MISSED
Model picked DET but SEA won. Projected margin was 7.1, the model overestimated by 13.1 points.
INSTANT CLASSIC
The win probability swung past 50% 5 times. One of the wildest games of the week.
ATS MISS
Missed the spread by 10.5 points.
Every model misses. The edge comes from the aggregate, not any single game.
SITUATIONAL TRENDS
Historical splits, shown for context only. We tested them: picking the situations that beat break-even in training goes 770–760 (50.3%) out of sample, so they are not a betting signal and are not coloured like one.
Every stat on this page is free, and so is the model's pick for this game. Pro is the separate question of which games we would actually bet, and at what stake, plus player props, unit sizing, and the full profit-and-loss ledger.